韓国フッ化水素の一年後

* はじめに
去年の七月に日本はフッ化水素などの規制適正化に踏みきった。ホワイト国適用を撤廃したが韓国はこれにつよく反発、対抗措置を発表、いわゆる徴用工への報復と主張した。日本の措置は戦略物資が北など危険な国に流出しないよう、国際的に当然の措置だったが、韓国は政府もふくめまったくこの事実をみとめず、さらに対抗措置をとった。日本人はなかばあきれ、ほぼ放置して一年をむかえた。この暴走はどこまでもと、おもえたが、あたらしい動きがでた。次のとおりである。

* 三十九トンのフッ化水素はどこに
韓国のネット掲示板に次の記事。昨年の報道で同年一から五月期にフッ化水素39tあまりの不明がでた。ここには不良品として日本に返却したものがあるが、それを差しひいても結局ほぼ39tが不明のままだった。これは両国関税当局の統計をもとにだした。これからがこのスレ主の主張だが、韓国政府は日本政府の照会にこたえず、非難、不買、国産化などで対抗した。彼はここで、このような現政権の姿勢をびしく批判したのだった。ここで注目すべきは、韓国人が横流しの具体的事実をはっきり口にしたことである。この事実にふれずひたすら日本攻撃にはげんでたのと大きな違いである。次の反応では、さらに北への横流し、国連制裁も口にしてる。

* 韓国人同士のやりとり
一、 フッ化水素はウラン濃縮につかう。そのため北への流出がうたがわれ、日本が制裁。結果韓国民がくるしんでる。
二、北で日本のフッ化水素が発見されたのは事実。日本から照会があったのに現政権が沈黙してるのも事実。このため韓国企業がくるしんでるのだ。
三、真実をいえるわけない。
四、包括許可から個別許可にかわった理由は結局のところ徴用工への制裁だ。
五、政府が輸入に関与してない。企業間の取引につきどうして政府に問いつめるのか。
六、政府が適正に管理すべき。これは否定できず、さらに状勢の変化におうじ早期にうごくべきだった。
七、(政府に責任がないのかにたいし)あえて日本にこたえる必要がなく、米国にするべき。
八、(日本にこたえなくてもよいか、にたいし)放置できない問題だったら米国ほか国連安保理が制裁にうごく。だからまだ不要。
九、二週間しか品質がもたないもの。それを三年分、変な注文だ。(大阪で開催された)G7で大統領が説明すると発言したのに、いまだに説明がない。おかしくないか。
十、二週間しかもたない。それを米国とか国際社会が北に流出させたと問題視するか。
十一、日本は三年分輸出し、その使途の解明を韓国に要求。韓国はこれにこたえず、日本は制裁に踏みった。それだけ。
以上、youtube江戸川 media lab HUBから書きおこしたが、一言、日本は国際約束である規制を適正化した。韓国が国産化できないからこれが事実上の制裁にみえるだけ。各国は日本の措置を適正として見まもってる。制裁と関係ない。さて本題にもどり、これらをどう見るか。これまでの失政により現政権の支持率が40%台となった。このやりとりでは事実をしり、それふまえ、よりきびしい批判となってる。政府やそれに忖度するマスコミの陰に隠れてた韓国人の本音がとどくようになった。政権の脆弱化がすすんでるようだ。日本はこれをどう見るか。

* 安倍政権の一貫した主張が功をそうした
それは韓国との妥協を排除した安倍政権の一貫した主張が功をそうした、と見る。親韓をにじませるマスコミや知識人は、何かといえば話し合いである。これは不毛な議論を日本にしいて消耗戦に巻きこむ戦略とみるべき。韓国は三菱などの資産売却を口にしながら、日本の制裁をおそれ実施に蹈みきってない。今回も八月の売却を口にして日本の妥協をうかがってる。さて結論である

* 結論
日本政府は制裁には慎重である。韓国はそれを見こして売却をにおわせて妥協を引きだそうとしてきた。何故か、日本には親韓の立場をもつ政治家が、いまも多数いる。制裁はその立場をあやうくする。政権内の動揺をおそれ慎重なのだろう。だが親韓で国民に不利益をしいるべきでない。理不尽な主張に一切妥協しないことが国民の利益にかなう。そう思いませんか。国民の皆さん。

コメント 1

Controversial paper work now mandatory for farmers

The proposal would also require the state government to have an agreement between farmers and farmers' organizations to establish rules regarding crop losses due to droughts, floods, heat waves, and the like.

A survey by the farm sector lobby group National Federation of Cooperative Agro Cooperative Associations (NFACCA) has also found that farmers' associations tend to favour the government proposal.

"The survey findings show that farmers' associations (CAFs) do not have any clear position on the farm policy," said NDFACCA chief executive Pankaj Srivastava.

The survey found that 72% of CAF members do not want to adopt the new rules, while 12% think that the proposed rules would make the farmers less able to compete in the agribusiness sector.

"Agriculture is still heavily politicized and not being taken seriously. These negative poll responses, combined with our analysis show that the government's farm policy proposal is having adverse impact in the country. The government should take up the challenge and implement a policy for a better outcome to farmers' and farmers' institutions in rural India," said Mr Srivastava.

Agriculture Minister Raman Singh met the federation executive chairperson Dinesh Mohan Bhattacharjee on Thursday to discuss the report. While Mr Bhattacharjee said there is no point for a farmers' federation, he said he welcomes it as "a step forward and a way forward".

"As far as the federation is concerned, the federation has no political agenda on the subject," Mr Bhattacharjee said. "We welcome the federation and urge them to move at a rapid pace to adopt the farm policy."

The draft government bill proposes to introduce a farm loan waiver and allow farmers to file cases of loss under Chapter 9 of the Protection of Rural Economy Act, 1986. It also proposes the state government to grant an interest-free credit against the costs of buying and selling land, and a 10% subsidy to farmers in the event of default, based on the annual profit on the assets on the loan.

The measure has been opposed by farming associations and some sections in the ruling party, which have complained that there has been no proper discussion on the legislation in the State Assembly and that even then the government has kept silent.
<a href=https://www.prakritikolkata.com/>카지노사이트</a>

Countdown to vaccine against childhood leukemia, an early vaccine that reduces the risk of catching a disease with a 100 percent vaccine success rate is being tested by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

In May 2007, at an American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) meeting, researchers demonstrated that a single vaccine of the type approved for fighting polio could treat the devastating disease in children aged up to two and could also prevent children from developing autism, a disorder that includes a serious emotional delay in development. As the AAP noted, "vaccines could also prevent the progression of cancers of the bone and connective tissue."

The announcement by a prominent cancer doctor to the conference came at the eleventh hour of a controversial bid by the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NCVIA) to pass through Congress a bill to expand the use of vaccines against childhood illnesses.

NCVIA has been an attempt by states to expand vaccines from childhoods that require vaccines against cancer or rabies to include diseases such as measles, mumps, rubella, polio and tetanus. Although several federal courts have blocked the expansion of these vaccines, the state of California sued to block it.

In the meantime, over two million childhood illnesses have been recognized, usually as vaccine-preventable diseases such as polio, measles, mumps, and rubella.

As the NCVIA has taken shape, scientists are increasingly realizing vaccines can be used as potent weapons against childhood diseases and other conditions — including those linked to cancer, autoimmune diseases, autism, and other illnesses that cause substantial disability. In March, a group of pediatric neurologists in Boston announced that they had successfully treated pediatric autoimmune encephalomyelitis with a single shot of the measles, mumps and rubella vaccine, and that they were making progress treating some children with cancer. A month later, in August, a team of immunologists in Oregon, working with a federal research arm of the NIH, reported that they had successfully treated cancer with vaccine against four previously immune-related causes of death and disability.

The breakthrough in cancer treatment for children was only one example of progress being made in cancer prevention research.

The success of these efforts is helping raise the awareness of the benefits of a multi-factorial, multi-package approach to disease prevention. By focusing on an individual disease, the multi-package approach involves vaccination, immunotherapy, immune-suppressive therapies and other treatment strategies.

At this point, the CDC, the FDA, and industry experts will continue to collaborate to ensure that all children are vaccinated against childhood illness as the disease warms and the threat of new vaccines and drugs makes an appearance.

Dr. James Altucher is director of the Center for Vaccine Research at the George Washington University Schoo
<a href=https://www.forexlingo.com/>온카지노</a>

by Zacharyjes (2020-07-10 14:25)